Thursday 25 August 2011

PIQUET VS MANSELL

Nelson Piquet career 1978-1991
Nelson Piquet started his Formula One career at age 26 near the end of the 1978 season with three drives for McLaren, achieving one ninth place finish in the old M23 model. Bernie Ecclestone then signed him for the Brabham team for the year’s last race in Canada, joining Lauda and Watson. He replaced Watson for 1979. Nelson could not have had a better formative start to F1 racing:, experienced team-leader Niki Lauda and he got on well. Based on season average, Lauda rated at 100.4; Piquet at a very creditable 100.7. After Lauda’s sudden retirement late in 1979, Piquet went on to lead the Bernie Ecclestone-owned team for eight seasons. From 1980 to 1984, he remained a leading contender and race winner. His best season was 1983 when he won the Drivers’ Championship and set a record ten poles in the beautiful, powerful Brabham-BMW turbo. Until 1987, Nelson remained a talented, shrewd race-winner, with great feel for the car and for race tactics.

Nigel Mansell career 1980-1995
Nigel Mansell also debuted at age 26 when he was taken on by Colin Chapman for Lotus for two races near the end of 1980. He retired in both. Chapman continued to believe in Nigel’s potential until his own untimely death in 1982. Overcoming this loss and several other difficulties, Mansell persevered. He started benefitting and displaying his talents after joining Williams in 1985. Thanks to his phenomenal winning record, sheer speed and fighting spirit, Nigel continues to have numerous fans and has garnered respect as one of the great drivers. Contrary to popular perception, Nigel was physically very sensitive, had superb feel and a delicate touch in the car. Much like a gifted musician. This is one of the reasons he was so good in wet conditions, and in an era when many drivers were not.

Despite their outstanding records, talent, abilities and long careers, neither Piquet nor Mansell seem to be mentioned in the same breath as Fangio, Moss, Clark, Stewart, Prost, Senna or Schumacher. This was certainly not due to any deficiencies in natural talent, which both had in abundance. Nigel’s phenomenal pole -setting lap at Silverstone in 1992 and Nelson’s speed and relish with the awesomely-powerful, turbocharged Brabham-BMWs of the mid-eighties, are just some of many examples of both drivers’ naturalness in the cockpit.

Piquet was perhaps too comfortable during his last six Brabham years. His team-mates were much slower, and never threatened or extended him. Perhaps this prevented him from overcoming the fastest team-mate he ever had: Nigel Mansell in 1986? . Thereafter, he crashed at high speed in practice at Imola in 1987; the consequent concussion definitely affected his speed. Mansell’s only weakness was in not being as politically-astute as some other great drivers in the out-of-cockpit internal team politics.

The table below compares their driver ratings (car neutral). Ultimate pace is 100.0, with ascending decimals being slower; each 0.1 being, say, 0.1 second in a 100.0 second lap. Bear in mind that, scored by this same Rating System, the peak ratings of Graham and Damon Hill and Emerson Fittipaldi were 100.5 when they won WDCs and that Hunt’s best rating was 100.3, Ronnie Peterson’s 100.2.

 
Season






1
1978
Piquet
101.8
1980
Mansell
102.0
2
1979
Piquet
100.7
1981
Mansell
100.7
3
1980
Piquet
100.5
1982
Mansell
100.6
4
1981
Piquet
100.3
1983
Mansell
100.6
5
1982
Piquet
100.1
1984
Mansell
100.5
6
1983
Piquet
100.0
1985
Mansell
100.8
7
1984
Piquet
100.2
1986
Mansell
100.4
8
1985
Piquet
100.3
1987
Mansell
100.3
9
1986
Piquet
100.3
1988
Mansell
100.2
10
1987
Piquet
100.5
1989
Mansell
100.4
11
1988
Piquet
100.7
1990
Mansell
100.4
12
1989
Piquet
100.9
1991
Mansell
100.3
13
1990
Piquet
100.8
1992
Mansell
100.4
14
1991
Piquet
101.0
1994
Mansell
100.8
15
-


1995
Mansell
101.4


Both drivers started off virtually equal-matched at 101.8 (Piquet) and 102.0 (Mansell), these ratings being within then-norms. Their real talent showed when teach rated 100.7 in their first full, second seasons! Stewart and Schumacher debuted at 100.8 and 100.7. Piquet continued a typical great driver’s climb to reach ultimate pace by his sixth season in 1983. By contrast, Mansell hardly improved after Colin Chapman’s death in 1982. The reasons were probably inter-team politics. Nelson was so comfortable with the Brabham team and designer-team-manager, Gordon Murray. Nigel did not have the support of new Lotus team manager Peter Warr, nor of many in the racing media, who did not rate his ability highly. In addition, he was competing with a very fast, naturally-talented team-mate, Elio de Angelis. Piquet had no team-mate threats at Brabham after Lauda retired, but he had had a season to learn from an experienced master; the two got on well and Lauda was very helpful.

The 1985 season was crucial to each driver’s career. Nelson was becoming de-motivated with his relatively low pay, and was looking around. Mansell left Lotus and joined 1982 Champion Keke Rosberg at Williams-Honda for 1985. Rosberg was very fast, and over the whole season shaded Nigel’s best times. In addition, Nigel was having to rebuild his own confidence and adapt to the new team and car with its powerful Honda turbo engine. By season’s end, Mansell had gained enough confidence to win at Kyalami. This when leader-from-the-start Keke slid on oil, Nigel took his chance and drove magnificently to his first win. This was a huge boost to his self-belief, which he was to retain until 1990. Piquet dropped from his peak to a still very fast 100.3 in 1985.

For 1986, Mansell was joined at Williams by Piquet after Rosberg moved to McLaren-Porsche. The Williams team were at the top, with unmatched Honda engines and two very competitive, virtually equal-rated drivers. Here lay the trouble: Piquet thought he would have little trouble from his team-mate who had never been highly-rated by many in the pit lane and the media. Nelson was in for a shock. Mansell won five times, he only four times in the season’s fastest car. Piquet’s response was to start out-of-cockpit tactics: very personal verbal warfare against Nigel.

At Imola early in 1987, Piquet crashed in practice and received concussion which slowed him by 0.2 secs per 100.0 sec lap for his rest-of- season average. Nelson related how he had suffered from headaches and tiredness for months afterwards. Nigel went on to six fine wins; Nelson admirably managed three.

Piquet left Williams for Lotus the next season - taking Honda engines with him - but his pace dropped to 100.7 and 100.9 for the two Lotus seasons 1988-89. Nigel stayed with Frank Williams and improved his ratings to peak at 100.2, despite Williams having lost Honda engines and having to make do with the small-budget and unreliable Judd engine. Nigel managed two fine seconds in the outclassed car. Riccardo Patrese joined Williams for 1988 and was to have such a beneficial affect on Mansell’s career later.

Piquet was lured to Benetton for his last two seasons 1990-91, where he raced at uninspired pace before retiring from F1. He first had as team-mate the fast but inexperienced ex-rally champion Nannini and then Moreno who equalled Nelson’s speed rating. Piquet’s race craft and experience nevertheless enabled him to take advantage of others’ troubles to score two more wins at the end of 1990. The first, thanks to the infamous Senna-Prost crash and Mansell’s Ferrari retirement in Japan, Piquet ‘inherited’ the win. He then scored another in Australia after leader Senna crashed. In 1991 Piquet managed one more win, in Canada, racing at a reduced season average of 101.0. The last five races of Nelson’s last season saw a link forged with the start of another era. The22 year-old Michael Schumacher became his team-mate and was immediately faster at 100.7 rating! Piquet’s experience, shrewd racing brain, car set-up skills and mechanical sensitivity were still there, however, as he just outscored the young German with a 4th , a 5th, a 6th and a 7th against a 5th , two 6ths and two retirements. This ended a great career of 23 wins.

 For 1989, Mansell accepted a good offer from Ferrari to join Gerhard Berger. The two chargers were close-matched for speed, but Mansell came out on top with two wins to Berger’s one in the unreliable-experimental, auto-gearbox Ferrari. Mansell was dubbed Il Leone by the Tifosi for his fighting performances and has remained a favourite in Italy.

For 1990, Mansell welcomed Alain Prost as team-mate at Maranello. Prost’s all-round diligence, political skills, technical competence and sheer speed shocked Nigel. He slowed to 100.4, even though Alain had dropped slightly from ultimate pace to 100.1. The wins went five-to-one in Prost’s favour in his great battles to try and beat Senna’s McLaren-Honda.

Mansell left Maranello at season’s end to rejoin Williams for 1991, now with advanced, pneumatic-valved, high-revving Renault engines. This proved a great move. Team-mate Patrese had done and continued to do most of the testing and development of the advanced Williams-Renaults. Consequently Riccardo became chief engineer Patrick Head’s favourite driver for his hard work and ability in testing, and for the fact that he would hop on a plane to test at a freezing Silverstone at any time. His more famed team-mate was not so inclined. The two got on well, mainly because Nigel was not threatened as he had been by Piquet and Prost. Mansell and Patrese scored five and two wins respectively in 1991. It must be mentioned that in the early races, the loyal Patrese virtually matched Nigel until his win in Mexico; hereafter he was told that ‘it was Nigel who must do the winning’!  In 1992 the Williams-Renault Team hit the jackpot. So did Mansell, who scored a record nine wins.

When he heard that Prost would be joining Williams for 1993, Mansell left to do Indycar racing. He returned to F1 for 1994 and some one-off drives for Williams-Renault in the wake of Senna’s death, and just about matched full-timer Damon Hill for speed. He scored a fine last win at the season-ending Australian GP. This after the infamous Schumacher-Damon Hill collision. Nigel’s last two F1 races in 1995 for McLaren-Ilmor-Mercedes failed: the car’s cockpit was too small! This saw the end of a great career at age that yielded 31 wins.

Purely coincidentally these two great drivers Piquet and Mansell debuted at age 26 and retired at 39 and 41 respectively. Piquet reached his ultimate, peak pace within six years, thereafter remained high rated for a further four seasons. . Mansell took eight years to reach his peak but he too remained at a high speed rating for another four seasons. Interestingly, even when each had slowed to 100.8 rating at 38 and 40 years old, they managed wins, albeit after faster packages retired!

In bare, historical stats, Piquet’s 23 wins places him up with Fangio, Nuvolari and Caracciola, while Mansell’s 31 puts him fourth of all time behind Schumacher’s 91, Prost’s 51 and Senna’s 41. One cannot read too much here into these stats nor make too close comparisons, but Nelson and Nigel really were in exceptional company.

© Patrick O’Brien. Nothing from this page can be used without the permission of Patrick E. O’Brien.

Monday 15 August 2011

PROST VS SENNA

Alain Prost
Alain Prost and Ayrton Senna are undoubtedly two of the greatest drivers. Fortunately their peaks overlapped for several seasons and for two years they shared a team. This has seldom occurred amongst top-rated drivers. Judging by the intensity of argument and the number of posts on the Planet-F1 Forum, the Alain versus Ayrton battles remain highly topical.

Using my Ratings System, which is based on time differentials in pre-race/qualifying/race laps and finishing times, Prost’s and Senna’s driver ratings, car neutral, are compared throughout their careers.

Ayrton Senna
In reading the Table below, bear in mind that 100.0 is the fastest, with increments of 0.1 ascending being slower. The figures can be read as percentages or as a fastest 100.0 second lap time.

Season






1
1980
Prost
100.5
1984
Senna
100.7
2
1981
Prost
100.4
1985
Senna
100.3
3
1982
Prost
100.3
1986
Senna
100.0
4
1983
Prost
100.2
1987
Senna
100.0
5
1984
Prost
100.1
1988
Senna
100.0
6
1985
Prost
100.0
1989
Senna
100.0
7
1986
Prost
100.0
1990
Senna
100.0
8
1987
Prost
100.0
1991
Senna
100.0
9
1988
Prost
100.0
1992
Senna
100.1
10
1989
Prost
100.0
1993
Senna
100.2
11
1990
Prost
100.1
1994
Senna
100.2
12
1991
Prost
100.2



1992
retired
-



13
1993
Prost
100.5





Very few rookies started with a 100.5 Rating as Prost did in 1980. This is 0.5 second off-pace on a 100.0-second lap. In a 60 lap race this would add up to 30 seconds behind the winner. Sounds a lot, but for such World Champions as Graham and Damon Hill, Jacques Villeneuve and Emerson Fittipaldi, 100.5 was their peak driver rating in their championship years! Alain was immediately exceptional: fast, diligent and mechanically-sensitive. He shaded talented and experienced team-mate John Watson, who rated at 100.6. But McLaren in 1980 were no longer the winners they used to be and were now struggling with overweight, inferior cars.

Renault poached Alain for 1981 and paired him with the fast-qualifying Rene Arnoux. Alain soundly outraced and out-rated Rene in speed at 100.4 to 100.7. For 1982 Arnoux ramped up his performances, and although Prost improved his speed rating to 100.3, Arnoux was almost equal at 100.4. The fastest driver of all in these two seasons was Gilles Villeneuve at 100.0. Prost’s last season with Renault in 1983 had him paired with the under-rated Eddie Cheever: they rated 100.2 and 100.5 respectively. Piquet now top-rated at the ultimate 100.0.

In the Kyalami pits in 1982, I asked Prost how he thought he and Piquet compared with earlier greats Stewart, Clark, Moss and Fangio. He replied:  “Today there are about four or five of us who are very good. But for you fans, it is unfortunate that none of us stands out like them. They were really great drivers”

After some public criticism of Renault’s not winning the 1983 championship, Prost was fired. He was immediately snapped up by the newly-formed McLaren team under Ron Denis, with de-retiree Niki Lauda as team-mat for 1984. The two drivers gelled. Both were rational-thinking experts at car development and set-up. Although not as fast as he was 1975-1977, Lauda rated at 100.3 against Alain’s 100.1. Niki was experienced, shrewd and crafty enough to take the championship by half a point from his faster young team-mate. The 1984 Championship was one of many to have been wrongly awarded due to being based on an arbitrary points system: Prost took seven wins to Lauda’s five. 1984 was however crucial to Prost’s development into one of the greatest drivers: he learnt so much from Lauda’s organised, precise, thoughtful behaviour and approach to racing, mostly outside the car. Lauda too was generous with his knowledge and experience.

Senna, then a little-noticed rookie, first featured this season when his Toleman-Hart TG184 finished an outstanding second to Prost at the storm-washed Monaco GP. The Brazilian went on to score two third places that same year with this very fast Tolemen-Hart model TG184. Senna started at much the same rating as most great drivers, including Michael Schumacher: 100.7. However he got to ultimate pace within just three years! Only John Surtees in 1961 and Auto-Union driver Bernd Rosemeyer back in 1937 were as precocious.

In 1985 and now fastest of all, at the ultimate 100.0, Prost completely overshadowed Lauda, who retired at year-end, good-naturedly and humourously blaming “that French pain-in-the arse.” The McLaren-Porsche was no longer the fastest car, being slower than the Lotus-Renault and the Ferrari 156/85. Prost still walked the title with five wins to Lauda’s one. Niki had slowed markedly and also suffered appalling bad luck all year with niggling mechanical troubles.

For 1986-87 several other cars were faster than the McLaren-Porsches, yet Alain’s brilliance managed four and three wins respectively. The dominant Williams-Hondas of Mansell and Piquet won nine races in each of those seasons.

From 1985 to 1987 Senna joined the Lotus team, now improved under the direction of the brilliant ex-Ligier designer Gerard Ducarouge. Ayrton managed two wins in each of the three seasons, his first being an outstanding drive in rainy Portugal. Lotus were however struggling to stay with the top teams, dropping pace each year.

For 1988 McLaren had secured Honda engines and employed Senna as Prost’s team-mate. Although Ayrton had top-rated since 1986, Alain generously welcomed him and, like Lauda, was quite open to helping and sharing. Senna was so intense in asking his team, “What’s he doing now?”, “Why’s he doing that?”, etc. His sole aim and passion was directed very personally at beating the acknowledged best driver of all: Prost. The Brazilian was then 28, the Frenchman 33.

So was born probably one of the strongest driver pairings, matched only a few times since 1894. With top-rated drivers in the fastest cars, 1988 was a McLaren-Honda walkover: Prost and Senna won 15 of 16 races, almost even-scoring at seven to eight respectively!

Still both top-rated for 1989, Senna took six wins to Prost’s four. Apart from Prost agreeing that Senna was faster and prepared to take more risks, being younger, the relationship had broken down. Before the start of one race Alain approached Ayrton and they agreed that, because they were unchallenged, they should not risk crashing at the first corner. Whoever got the best start would have the corner. Prost did so and was braking to enter when Senna charged up the inside and took the lead. Another factor that added to the inter-driver friction is that Honda were supplying Senna with superior engines. Prost left at the end of 1989 after six seasons and 30 wins.

Prost joined Mansell at Ferrari for 1990. Nigel had been there since 1989 and was a popular two-time race winner, admiringly called Il Leone for his fighting spirit.

Totally shading Mansell with 5 wins to 1, Prost just could not take the title from Senna in his faster McLaren-Honda with the Brazilian managing six wins. Never did Prost fight harder against the odds than in this year.

Under Fiat-mismanagement for 1991, Ferrari went downhill fast and Prost did not win a single race. Alain expressed his frank opinion to the media at year’s end and was fired. Senna continued to thrive at McLaren-Honda, taking another seven wins. But Williams-Renault cars were fast improving, with drivers Mansell and Patrese winning six races.

After much convoluted, inter-season contractual wrangling among Frank Williams, Prost, Senna, and Mansell, Alain decided not to race in 1992, Ayrton stayed with McLaren-Honda and Nigel re-signed with Williams-Renault.

Only McLaren-Honda’s experience and Senna’s superiority as a driver gave him three wins for 1992. The most advanced GP car of all time, the Williams-Renault FW14B driven by Mansell and Patrese, won ten times.

A very human side of Senna was related to me by Mrs Margie Stephens, the librarian-archivist for the AA of South Africa, the new owners of Kyalami. Margie was struggling to move several cartons of documents from a storeroom at the back of the pits to another. Senna saw this, and immediately came over and insisted on carrying the rest of them!

Prost returned to F1 for 1993, replacing Mansell at Williams-Renault. After his 1990 Ferrari experience with Alain, Nigel opted out of F1 and went Indy Car racing. The loyal, hardworking and under-rated Patrese was replaced by Damon Hill in only his first full season. Senna remained with McLaren, who had lost their Honda engines, replacing them with less powerful, less efficient Cosworths. His team-mate was Indy star but F1 rookie Michael Andretti.

In the superior Williams-Renault FW15, Prost cantered to the 1993 title with 7 wins added to the 3 Damon took late in the season. Alain was now racing at 100.5, taking no chances. He sincerely praised Damon’s abilities, while Hill wryly said he thought Prost was showing some talent! A good team atmosphere. Senna railed against his off-pace McLaren-Cosworth and cheekily offered to drive a Williams-Renault without pay. Yet Ayrton managed five great, fighting wins, including that phenomenal performance at rainy Donington when he dominated the field in one of the greatest ever wet-weather displays. It was reminiscent of Rosemeyer in 1936 at the Nurburgring. Prost retired after the 1993 season.

Senna joined Williams-Renault for 1994 alongside Damon Hill. Now 34, Ayrton had dropped slightly in sheer speed - perhaps due to team contracts and personal reasons. In competitiveness, motivation, experience, race craft, team-management-pull and car development, he was still supreme. But there was a new threat: young Michael Schumacher in a Bennetton-Cosworth that handled better initially than the Williams-Renault FW16. Senna took pole in the first three events by really trying hard. He led the season-opening Brazilian GP for 21 laps before losing the lead to Schumacher during a pitstop. Chasing hard but not being able to close the gap, Senna spun off near the end. Schumacher won. In race two at Fuji, Schumacher got a better start to led from the flag while Senna was punted out at turn one. The third race was at Imola. Senna led from the start until the race was slowed behind the safety-car while others’ crash debris was cleared. Senna leapt ahead again as the safety- car pulled off. With Schumacher’s Benetton-Cosworth right on his tail and the Williams-Renault bottoming and sparking, Senna went straight on at the 270kmh Tamburello into the wall...

It was the virtual performance equality between the Senna/Williams-Renault and Schumacher/ Benetton-Cosworth packages, coupled with Ayrton’s fierce competitiveness, that caused Ayrton to overdrive his not-yet-warm-tyred car at Imola. He was rattled by having Michael so close behind. Damon Hill always maintained that “Ayrton just made a mistake.”

Exceptionally, both Senna and Prost raced at the ultimate pace of 100.0 for five to six seasons - something only Alonso, Schumacher, Clark, Stewart and Moss achieved in the F1 era. Alain and Ayrton were very different characters, and they remain as two of the greatest of all time.

© Patrick O’Brien 2011. Nothing from this page can be used without the permission of Patrick E. O’Brien.